Miku Tomioka profile picture

Miku Tomioka

May 26, 2023 • Investing

The Tortoise and the Hare: The Case for Passive Investing

The Merits and Drawbacks of the Passive Investing Voyage

The Tortoise and the Hare: The Case for Passive Investing

Passive investing is the financial world's equivalent of "slow and steady wins the race." It's a long-term strategy that doesn't chase hot stocks or try to time the market. Instead, it rides the wave of the overall market performance with a cool and steady hand on the rudder.

What is Passive Investing?

Passive investing is an investment strategy that aims to maximize returns over the long term by keeping the amount of buying and selling to a minimum. It's the tortoise in the race, steadily plodding along, unworried by the hare's bursts of speed.

Investors using this strategy will often invest in index funds (like the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones Industrial Average), which are designed to replicate the performance of an entire market index. Passive investing is based on the theory that over the long term, despite the inevitable ups and downs, the market will provide positive returns.

The Pros of Passive Investing

1. Cost-Effective: One of the key benefits of passive investing is its cost-effectiveness. Since the strategy involves minimal trading, it significantly reduces the transaction fees and management costs that active investors typically pay.

2. Lower Stress: Passive investing can be less stressful than active investing because it doesn't involve constantly watching the market or trying to predict its next move.

3. Diversification: By investing in broad market indexes, passive investors achieve diversification, which can mitigate risk.

4. Performance: Interestingly, passive funds have been shown to outperform their actively managed counterparts. According to S&P Dow Jones Indices, over the 10 years ending December 2020, 88% of large-cap fund managers failed to outperform the S&P 500.

The Cons of Passive Investing

1. No Downside Protection: Unlike active investing, where managers may take steps to protect against market downturns, passive investing offers no such downside protection.

2. Limited Upside: While index funds allow investors to capture market returns, they also limit investors from outperforming the market.

3. Lack of Control: With passive investing, you're tied to the fate of the index you're tracking. If the index plunges, so does your investment.

Passive Investing vs. Other Strategies

Compared to active investing, passive investing is like setting your car on cruise control. Active investing, on the other hand, is like a manual transmission, where you're shifting gears and making adjustments based on road conditions. Active investing tries to beat the market through buying and selling strategies, while passive investing aims to mirror the market.

However, beating the market consistently is challenging. According to Morningstar, over a 10-year period ending in 2019, only 23% of active funds outperformed their passive counterparts.

Passive investing also compares favorably with day trading, a strategy that involves frequent buying and selling of stocks. While day trading can lead to high returns, it's also risky and time-consuming. It also incurs significant transaction fees, which can eat into any profits.

Final Thoughts

Passive investing is a cost-effective, stress-free strategy that has demonstrated its ability to provide solid returns over the long term. While it lacks the excitement of active investing or day trading, its steady-as-she-goes approach could be the key to winning the investing race. Just ask the tortoise.

Reasonably Ruthless Copyright © 2024